Transparency Report

How we test whether our Human Digital Twins reflect the people behind them.

Every Human Digital Twin starts with an in-depth interview with a real, consented participant. We structure 120+ data points, test responses against held-back human answers and publish the limits clearly.
Benchmarked Directional Agreement
120+ Data Points Per Twin
Transparent Process
Evidence With Clear Limits

The Right Question to Ask

The useful question is not whether a Human Digital Twin gives the same words every time. It is whether the themes, preferences and reasoning point in the same direction as the person behind it. AYA measures that overlap and shows where the method should—and should not—inform a decision.

How Human Digital Twins Are Built and Tested

Four stages connect every answer back to a real interview and make validation part of the build rather than a claim added afterwards.
01
Recruit & Interview

It starts with real people. We conduct structured one-to-one interviews with actual consumers — capturing motivations, values, decision triggers, emotional responses, and behavioral patterns that surveys can't reach.

02
Build the Individual Profile

The interview is structured into 120+ data points across demographics, personality, values, consumer behaviour, communication, technology, interests and decision-making. The detail remains tied to one individual rather than an invented segment average.

03
Create the Human Digital Twin

The structured profile grounds a Human Digital Twin that can respond to new briefs using the person's recorded context, language and decision trade-offs. The system is instructed to stay within that evidence rather than invent a generic character.

04
Validate Against the Human

We compare the Human Digital Twin with answers held back from the original interview and, on selected studies, with human responses to the same brief. Differences are evidence too: they define where the result needs caution or further human validation.

120+ Data Points Behind Each Individual.

The profile captures the context that shapes how someone interprets a question and makes a choice. These are the eight customer-facing categories—not an inventory of every internal field.

Each twin profile spans 8 data categories

Demographics
Examples
Life stage
Location
Work and household
Personality
Examples
Openness
Conscientiousness
Social orientation
Values & Beliefs
Examples
Core values
Social priorities
Cultural outlook
Consumer Behaviour
Examples
Price sensitivity
Brand loyalty
Convenience needs
Communication Style
Examples
Preferred channels
Tone and formality
Feedback style
Decision-making & Choice Drivers
Examples
Risk tolerance
Peer influence
Trust and proof
Technology Usage
Examples
Platform preferences
Adoption speed
Digital confidence
Interests & Lifestyle
Examples
Interests
Media habits
Lifestyle choices

87%

Average Alignment

Based on AYA validation testing

What This Number Actually Means

Across our validation testing, Human Digital Twin responses show 87% average alignment with the people they represent. This measures overlap in themes, preferences and reasoning—not word-for-word identity or a prediction of commercial outcomes.

AYA provides strong directional evidence. It should be paired with appropriate human research for high-stakes, regulated or statistically representative decisions.

Where AYA Works Best, and Where It Doesn't

Directional evidence is most useful when its boundaries are visible. These are the situations where AYA can guide a decision and where human validation matters more.
Sensory & Physical Experiences

Products where texture, taste, scent, or physical handling drive purchase decisions are harder to simulate. AYA excels at evaluating messaging, positioning, and creative — not sensory response.

Best for:Messaging, positioning, creative evaluation
Less suited:Tactile product testing, taste/scent evaluation
Specialised B2B & Niche Domains

Highly technical verticals with unique jargon, workflows, or procurement processes may require custom twin calibration. Our standard twin library is optimised for consumer-facing markets.

Best for:Consumer brands, lifestyle, retail, media
Less suited:Deep technical B2B without custom calibration
Cultural Recency & Rapid Shifts

Twins are calibrated against stable behavioral patterns. Rapidly shifting cultural moments, viral trends, or breaking news can create temporary gaps until the next calibration cycle catches up.

Best for:Stable preferences, long-term brand strategy
Less suited:Viral-moment reactions, breaking-news sentiment

AYA is designed to inform decisions, not make them. Pair it with in-market validation when the stakes, regulation or need for statistical representation are highest.

Our Commitments

The principles that guide how we build, validate, and deploy Human Digital Twins.
Designed to Inform, Not Decide

AYA helps teams stress-test assumptions, compare directions and surface blind spots. It does not predict commercial outcomes or replace professional judgement. The final decision remains yours.

Bias Controls & Transparency

We use balanced audience selection, prompt guardrails and validation checks to reduce leading responses and expose disagreement. Material limitations and methodology changes are documented rather than hidden.

Privacy & Consent

Human Digital Twins are built from consented research participants. Customers receive bounded research profiles and generated evidence rather than source interview transcripts or direct identifiers.

Your Data Stays Yours

Other customers cannot access your workspace research. AYA processes it only to operate, secure and support the service, does not sell it to competitors, and uses contracted AI APIs whose foundation models are not trained on customer prompts or outputs by default.

Ready to Validate With Confidence?

See how Human Digital Twins can transform your research process — or explore plans that fit how you work.